This is a great article questioning the purpose of trials and verdicts for abuse against women. It doesn't say that the culprit shouldn't be punished but raises a genuine concern of what can be done to prevent from this country producing such culprits in the first place. It's ok and we do understand that strict rules and bills need to be passed to punish those who treat women badly but will that really protect women nd give them the real sense of safety.
Articles starts off with the present punishments that exists and which are to be newly passed and then takes us through a rigorous explanation of how these cases would be treated and how circumstances will be considered based on a women's age of consent, the time of crime committed and the verdict execution based on crime intensity. However Author says that our system should majorly concentrate on preventing such incidents to happen rather then taking measures on how to punish the culprits 'after' the crime is committed. He then reason some of the existing systems of khap and other ignorant traditions which still exists in our society which encourage abuse against women. Also passing a bill on crime against women and defining only few nature of crimes would surely rule out some of the cases which will never come into light like violence against women after the marriage and violence against men other men.Though articles tries to give in enough statistics and facts in making certain points valid, it is clear that Author is skeptical that passing bills and making punishments sever will not put women in any safe condition.
Finally Author ends the note with a ray of hope that out system will reason this sooner or later so that prevention is given better importance then looking out for a blind cure.
- Vamshi Regalla
