This Article talks about the way Obama had been biased towards Israel over Palestine and how such action should be hidden from press at least in order to curb any form of prejudices which the Media already has over Obama's administration.Author starts off with few examples on the kind of words used in his speech by President Obama on his visit to both the nations which are in conflict. His speech clearly showed how he was biased towards Jews of Israel and how he showed his immense friendliness towards Israel's president at the same his speech in Palestine showed how diplomatic he was being to make sure that he doesn't give out any hints that he was being partial to Israel.
At one point author points out how easy it is for an outsider who has viewed both the visits to judge on Obama's partiality towards one nation over other. He suggests that such acts would only bring bitter consequences to face since a person of hid cadre was in actuality expected to be more unbiased than ever because its the matter of two countries who are fight for borders, religion and illegal immigrants Obama's support for illegal immigration from Israel to Palestine, His good gesture over Jews settling in the borders of Palestine and his denial over Palestine's suppression over the border settles would only make things more severe and Palestine seems little happy for Obama ignoring their point of view of losing the native identity.
Author finally ends with a note that such a gesture from Obama shows his vulnerability for the allegations he is facing back at home for mistreating minority religions back at home and his extended support for Israel Jews and an outright statement that Israel would soon turn into a country of Jews would only ignite the sentiments of native Israelis who are not Jewish.
- Vamshi Krishna
- Vamshi Krishna
No comments:
Post a Comment